Current Cases

Lifelock Litigation

The Paynter Law Firm has sued LifeLock, a heavily promoted company that claims to protect consumers against identity theft. The lawsuit alleges that the company defrauds customers by offering services it cannot legally perform, and by touting a $1 million guarantee that the suit alleges is wildly misleading. LifeLock uses aggressive advertising to entice consumers to sign up for its $10-a-month service which it describes as "proactive identity theft protection, offer[ing] a proven solution that prevents your identity from being stolen before it happens." According to the lawsuit there are types of identity theft that LifeLock does not protect against and the company overstates the protection consumers get from fraud alerts. For a copy of the most recent complaint in the litigation, click here.

Back to Current Cases
image

LATEST NEWS

Settlement Preliminarily Approved in Lifelock Litigation

April 16, 2010

A settlement negotiated by lead counsel Hagens Berman on behalf of Plaintiffs in In re Lifelock Inc, Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation has been preliminarily approved by the Court. Concurrently Lifelock announced a settlement with the FTC and numerous state attorneys generals. The Court found the settlement to be "in the best interests of putative class members" and determined that Plaintiffs' actions were a "precipitating factor in the FTC settlement." For a copy of the order preliminarily approving the settlement click here.

Judge Allows Antitrust Suit Against Nestle USA to Proceed

January 6, 2010

Following extensive argument before the Honorable John E. Munter of the Complex Department of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, the Court refused to dismiss a suit against Nestle USA alleging that Nestle USA participated in a conspiracy to fix the price of chocolate products in the United States and Canada. For a transcript of the proceedings and a copy of the order please click here.

Judge Allows Suit by Madden Gamers Against Electronic Arts to Proceed

A federal judge today allowed a suit by two purchasers of Electronic Arts Madden football videogame to proceed. The suit captioned Pecover v. Electronic Arts alleges that Electronic Arts unlawfully monopolized the market for interactive football videogames. In his opinion rejecting Electronic Arts’ challenges to Plaintiffs’ antitrust claims under California and federal law, Judge Vaughn Walker held that the “theories advanced” by Electronic Arts all “miss their mark.” A copy of the opinion can be found here.

Read More
The Paynter Law Firm Files Suit Against the NCAA, Electronic Arts and the CLC for the Use of NCAA Player Likenesses

The Paynter Law Firm today filed suit against the NCCA, Electronic Arts and the Collegiate Licensing Company on behalf of Plaintiff Samuel Keller, former Nebraska and ASU quarterback. The suit alleges an unlawful conspiracy to use NCAA player likenesses in videogames produced by Electronic Arts. Filed in the Northern District of California, the case seeks damages on behalf of all NCAA division I football and basketball players whose names and/or likenesses were utilized in Electronic Arts videogames. A copy of the complaint in the action can be found here.

Read More
The Paynter Law Firm Wins Remand of Case Against Nestle USA

A federal judge today ordered a lawsuit brought on behalf of California consumers remanded to California Superior Court for the County of San Francisco. The remand opinion will permit a California court to address claims that Nestle USA participated in an unlawful conspiracy to fix the price of chocolate products in the United States. A copy of the opinion can be found here.

Read More
Consolidated Complaint Filed in Lifelock Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation.

Lead counsel Hagens Berman Sobol & Shapiro today filed a consolidated master complaint in the In re Lifelock Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation. A copy of the new consolidated complaint can be found here.

Read More
Judge Allows Lawsuit on Behalf of NCAA Student Athletes to Proceed.

Feb. 8, 2010 A federal judge today allowed a suit by former NCAA quarterback Sam Keller to proceed against the NCAA, Electronic Arts and the Collegiate Licensing Company. The suit alleges that the defendants conspired to unlawfully use the name and likenesses of NCAA student athletes in videogames produced by Electronic Arts. In allowing the suit to proceed, the Court expressly rejected claims by Electronic Arts that it had a First Amendment right to utilize player names and likenesses in its videogames. The Court’s decision establishes a strong precedent for athletes and individuals everywhere seeking to prevent corporations and sports leagues from exploiting their names and likenesses for commercial gain. For a copy of the decision, please click here.

Read More

Report a fraud

The Paynter Law Firm, PLLC 1200 G Street - Suite 800 - Washington, D.C. 20005